In Reply to: RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt posted by patrickU on July 3, 2008 at 13:16:16:
>> The guy in the suit, was it?>>
Yes.
>> Or was it crafted?>>
Creature suits are all crafted.
>> It does not change anything anyway,>>
It doesn't? You want to stand by this assertion of yours? "And then you see like in this particular film the actress, in this case that young girl, looking somewhere pretending to see the Pan or something else.
You know what?
It cries out loud : FAKE!"
She was looking at something that was actually there. Ironically this may not actually be the case in any number of your favorite films. It is often physically imposible to put the off camera person in position for an on camera actor to actually look at them in close ups. They are often just looking at a dot placed on the camera for an eyeline.
>>the whole scenery was digital and untrue to my senses.>>
Actually there was very little in the way of digital back grounds. It was almost all practical sets.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - Analog Scott 13:40:12 07/03/08 (7)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - patrickU 04:51:17 07/04/08 (6)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - Analog Scott 08:59:44 07/04/08 (5)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - patrickU 01:38:14 07/05/08 (4)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - Analog Scott 12:00:19 07/05/08 (3)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - patrickU 12:09:14 07/05/08 (2)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - Analog Scott 12:28:47 07/05/08 (1)
- RE: what specific digital effects are you talking about? nt - patrickU 13:16:42 07/05/08 (0)