In Reply to: Wrong, possibly on two counts... posted by EBerlin on October 22, 2008 at 18:03:21:
interesting and detailed opinion--- with reasoning to bolster it.
First off, I think you're being a bit unfair to Burns. The audience isn't meant to be the cognoscenti but the general public; remember, jazz is by far the least popular musical idiom, today, but yesteryear it was the most popular: it's edifying to look at the performers that made it so.
The narrative style is a legitimate gripe but every filmmaker has his own. One can criticize Moore, also, but he and the Burns boys are masters at communication. Neither attempts to be the ultimate word: they serve as popularizers of a viewpoint or medium. As such, their success is unmatched.
I'd also argue that it was a fairly representative group of commentators: Nat Hentoff (ignored by Jazz Inmate) prominently was used.
But, and this is a major, I've only seen the particular disc I mentioned. I certainly don't see any fatal flaws in it: the narration, the talking-heads, and the vintage performances--- visually and sonically--- were very satisfying.
Now, why don't YOU do a jazz-theme documentary?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- As usual, you are one of the few here that take the time to provide - tinear 11:35:54 10/23/08 (3)
- Thanks for your post - EBerlin 11:57:31 10/23/08 (2)
- Do you think a group of smaller jazz labels, as well as the - tinear 12:11:03 10/23/08 (1)
- RE: Do you think a group of smaller jazz labels, as well as the - EBerlin 14:05:09 10/23/08 (0)