In Reply to: Ah...Not exactly... posted by Harmonia on January 11, 2011 at 16:54:42:
"...true, the filmmakers couldn't make Persepolis as a live action movie in Iran. But they could have made it somewhere else with live action. If they'd wanted to. But why would they?"It's not a big mystery why expatriate Iranians aren't lining up to provoke the mullahs. Even if they're not concerned about their own safetly, expatriates have relatives who still live in Iran. It's a bit naive of you to think an Iranian can show his face in a movie critical of Iranian leadership and there will be no repurcussions for him or his family.
As for the animation--that's not what made Persepolis a good movie. Obviously it was an attempt to bring the graphic books to the screen, but it's the underlying story and yearning for freedom in the face of repression that resonates with the viewer.
Edits: 01/11/11
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- A bit naive - Jazz Inmate 17:50:51 01/11/11 (4)
- Jee whiz... - Harmonia 17:58:54 01/12/11 (3)
- And to prove my point... - Harmonia 18:25:55 01/12/11 (2)
- Thanks for using JI to enlighten us. Of course, shining a light - tinear 16:59:28 01/14/11 (0)
- IOW, she humanized and multi-culturized her art to make it more accessible. - Tony D. 19:31:46 01/12/11 (0)