In Reply to: Aaarrghh posted by Jon L on September 26, 2011 at 11:00:15:
What makes is so foreign to a typical American viewer is not the language, it is the focus on humans amidst the space technology and travel.
In a typical American sci-fi film (2001 being one such example), the technology is the subject. In Solaris the technology is nothing but just the background, the setting.
Therefore anyone coming to Solaris with an expectation of seeing another Star Dreck Tropper (sorry, can't remember the title properly), albeit somewhat better, will walk away grossly disappointed.
On the other hand, anyone attuned to say, Bergman, will take to Solaris like fish to water, never mind the space station and Visitors.
Solaris is not a Russian 2001... in fact the two films share almost nothing. Solaris is much more Wild Srawberries set in next century.
![]()
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Solaris is a foreign film on more than just trivial level - Victor Khomenko 12:28:58 09/26/11 (6)
- No need to bash one to praise the other. 2001 is genius, too, and the POINT of it is - tinear 09:27:20 09/27/11 (3)
- "just as you accuse semuta" He served warm beer??? - Victor Khomenko 12:09:45 09/27/11 (2)
- Send me Blu-ray, you dinosaur! :-) nt - tinear 14:59:55 09/27/11 (1)
- I am just a poor EE - Victor Khomenko 19:07:21 09/27/11 (0)
- RE: Solaris is a foreign film on more than just trivial level - avsBuddy 07:37:50 09/27/11 (1)
- Agreed. The Criterion transfer is a revelation. (nt) - semuta 10:57:45 09/29/11 (0)