They should have changed the category to, "Least Crappy."
"Midnight in Paris," easily wins that.
"Hugo?" Boring.
I won't go down the line. They're mostly insufferable. I'd take any of the Bourne films over them. I thoroughly dislike Hollywood remakes, but I'd swallow my principles and go for Tattoo if I were pressed to choose a dramatic film.
Pathetic.
Why not just lump foreign and domestic into one category for Best Film? Hollywood would never win again.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Oscar nominees announced: the worst year I can recall for "Best Film." - tinear 08:58:40 01/24/12 (9)
- "Eleven. Exactly. One Louder." - Vinylized 10:28:59 01/25/12 (0)
- So why are you giving them your money? - Victor Khomenko 10:12:15 01/24/12 (6)
- Some of the stuff is good, not great. And NO home experience matches a theater one. nt - tinear 17:36:29 01/24/12 (5)
- "And NO home experience matches a theater one. " Invite me. - Victor Khomenko 19:40:12 01/24/12 (4)
- be sure to text/talk on your phone, stick gum to tin's sofa, spill your soda, kick tin in the back, etc. NT - Jazz Inmate 18:57:53 01/25/12 (2)
- He just canceled my invitation... BTW - a question! - Victor Khomenko 06:17:29 01/26/12 (1)
- "Does the movie theater experience make a bad film better or badder?" - Jazz Inmate 16:50:52 01/26/12 (0)
- LOL! nt - tinear 12:34:49 01/25/12 (0)
- I wish every catagory was best of the world, not just USA, but that is not Hollywood's interest it seems - PhilJ 10:10:21 01/24/12 (0)