Home Films/DVD Asylum

Movies from comedy to drama to your favorite Hollyweird Star.

You are always polite,

"Look, it was never my intention to slaughter your sacred cow."

Sacred cow ? Is 2001 beyond criticism ? Of course not- it's just beyond your attempts at criticism.

Wise directed what some might consider "great films"- but that does not make him a great director. I don't think his list of screen credits puts him in any way in the same league as Kubrick. Competent enough- when given the right material, actors and budget to work with-(hey- who isn't ?) but not a great director. Nothing he has done sets him apart from a host of others. A "new" Star Trek with new special effects will probably make a lot of money.

"The insulting description you're applying to the Star Trek series as being "children's films" suggests you may have a prejudice against films which combine action along with cerebral elements."

Prejudice ? Hardly. Films that are made for the "target" audience age of whatever the studio's research shows it to be (teens no doubt) have resulted in the "juvenilisation" of American cinema. So it goes. Market forces are what market forces are. I don't have to like films such as Star Trek, but to pretend they appeal to anything but the most ordinary adolescent's understanding of cinema is preposterous.

"Oh, I get it! You're just jealous because you DIDN'T get to see the Cinerama presentation while the format existed!"

No- you don't get it. You decided the film's one great strength was cinerama- and you went on about Imax etc. How you draw conclusions about what I have seen or haven't seen is drivel.

All of my posts on this subject critcise your opinion as being shallow - I have no wish to drift over to the right of the page. You can rant about Star trek all you like- it only proves my point.

"Charley" won the Oscar for the Best Childrens TV film in 1965.

Your posts say "Charley". You said that "Charley" won an Academy Award. Go fish for your apology. If you meant "Charly", you should have typed Charly.

Cliff Robertson won the Best Actor Academy Award in 68 for "Charly" - so what ? Does the award bestowed upon the actor somehow make Charly a great film ? Oliver! won Best Picture, Charly wasn't even nominated. Not a great year by the look of it.

In the vernacular of Oliver!- you are a right Charlie.



This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.