In Reply to: You are TECHNICALLY correct, buckaroo, but only technically. posted by Audiophilander on November 28, 2001 at 14:18:16:
In the mid Sixties Paramount was just a studio, not the part-time network they are today. They made pilots and tried to sell them to the networks. Nobody bought the first Star Trek pilot. Lost in Space went on the air on CBS and was a hit. Then, as you write, "Paramount decided to take another look after Lost in Space aired and greenlighted a second pilot". At that point NBC bought the show. It's reasonable to conclude that that decision was driven by the success of Lost in Space. Therefore, Star Trek would have remained just another one of the thousands of failed and forgotten pilots if not for Lost In Space.>>Star Trek...reached a more adult audience with thought provoking ideas, analogies and visions of a better future.<<
Not true. Star Trek was cancelled because its audience was largely teenagers and children, not the adults that advertisers wanted. As for "visions of a better future", I'm not sure that I'd characterize a militarist - if not outright fascist - state like the Federation as a "better future". I've never seen any evidence that the Federation is a democracy.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- No, I'm right - period. - Rob Doorack 06:57:45 11/29/01 (7)
- Pardon me, no offense, but you're partially incorrect! (exclamation point!) - Audiophilander 11:06:44 11/29/01 (0)
- tsk,tsk,tsk - late 07:58:36 11/29/01 (5)
- Re: tsk,tsk,tsk - Rob Doorack 09:05:37 11/29/01 (4)
- Re: tsk,tsk,tsk - Bruce from DC 13:18:28 12/01/01 (2)
- Re: tsk,tsk,tsk - Rob Doorack 13:30:03 12/03/01 (1)
- Re:advancing senility takes its toll - Bruce from DC 16:32:15 12/03/01 (0)
- a conclusion few would share - late 09:20:14 11/29/01 (0)