In Reply to: Re: Denon Receivers posted by monk on January 8, 2004 at 06:32:53:
>the back panel says the 1804 is rated to drive speakers rated at 6
>ohms and above Vs. the 3803 can handle 4 ohm speakers. Driving 5, 6
>or 7 speakers is tough work and there's real value in having a more
>robust current handling ability (this is just not more watts, it's
>able to handle a tougher electrical load at the same watt level).Are you sure the 3803 can handle 4 ohms? I looked on the picture and in the specs and it seems to be marked as 6-16 ohms as well. If it can handle 4 ohms then there is value in the 3803 over the 1804 if you own 4 ohm speakers; however, if you're driving 8 ohm speakers (the vast majority of speakers on the market) then you're going to see no advantage there. As for the current handling, I believe both receivers use separate amps for each channel. The 3803 has higher wattage capabilities (110W @ 8 ohms vs. 90W @ 8 ohms for the 1804) and will probably sound slightly cleaner at higher volumes, but not $200 cleaner.
>can it up-convert S-Video and Composite to Component and thus output
>all video signals to the display via a single connection?In a word, no. I just checked out the 1804 manual and it says quite plainly that neither the compsite/S signal nor the component signals are interchangeable. In that, the 3803 has an advantage over the 1804. Good point on that one!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Denon Receivers - Some Guy 07:25:08 01/08/04 (5)
- Re: Denon Receivers - monk 09:20:24 01/08/04 (4)
- Re: Denon Receivers - Some Guy 11:23:11 01/08/04 (3)
- Re: Denon Receivers - Bob C 13:29:37 01/09/04 (2)
- I paid around $700 for my 3803 but... - AbeCollins 10:31:27 01/11/04 (0)
- $700 for a new 3803 is extremely good, best I've seen <nt> - monk 14:56:55 01/09/04 (0)