In Reply to: Re: Denon Receivers posted by monk on January 8, 2004 at 09:20:24:
>If I have made a mistake on the specs, sorry.No apology needed! We're just sharing info, monk!
Also, I checked around and the lowest price I could find on the 3803 was $999. If anyone can snag it for $700 from an authorized dealer, I couldn't argue with that at all.
>I still would agree with your basic point, i.e., for very many users
>the 2 receivers would be equally good. And this being the case many
>people would enjoy having the extra hundreds neatly tucked into the
>wallet (where they belong!)Very true... unfortunately most of my friends don't agree and MUST have the best even though their rooms don't allow for it (my friend has a 12' x 8' home theatre room with all of this high end equipment crammed into it to the point of suffocation. It's hurts to hold my tongue after trying to make the point, but to each his own.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Denon Receivers - Some Guy 11:23:11 01/08/04 (3)
- Re: Denon Receivers - Bob C 13:29:37 01/09/04 (2)
- I paid around $700 for my 3803 but... - AbeCollins 10:31:27 01/11/04 (0)
- $700 for a new 3803 is extremely good, best I've seen <nt> - monk 14:56:55 01/09/04 (0)