In Reply to: Re: Actually... posted by kotches on December 19, 2001 at 05:14:29:
The point was, that there is information missing in the 2.35:1 version on the DVD (from the top and bottom)."If you compare the typical humans field of view for image width vs image height, the width has much more range."
Ah, but what is that range? Is it exactly 2.35:1, with squared borders? And, what does this have to do with anything anyway?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Indeed, but that wasn't my point... - CarlEber 20:07:36 12/19/01 (0)