In Reply to: Re: That's the best explanation I've received so far posted by chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com on September 10, 2005 at 15:01:00:
I've tried a DVD, and the picture is fine, pretty much as I expected.However, I rarely watch DVDs. This TV was bought primarily to watch via terrestrial analogue signals. As I've explained elsewhere in this thread, we don't have access to cable, or satellite (trees in the way), or terrestrial digital (not in this area yet). There seems little point in paying extra for a poorer picture using the existing signal.
Given the signal we do have, and the purpose for which we want a TV, our best choice appears to be old-fashioned CRT.
Cheers,Ivan
"What's neo-realism?" "No money."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I'm already sure it's the signal that's the problem - bigi 02:34:57 09/11/05 (0)