In Reply to: "B-D discs are easier to damage physically"--you've done stress tests? posted by Jazz Inmate on August 21, 2007 at 09:52:21:
The relative sensitivity to damage is what magazines, like Widescreen Review, reported among the pluses and minuses of each format. Personally, I don't abuse my discs, so it is not a big deal to me either way. I don't care at all which standard survives, but, it seems important for the market for one to succeed. As I stated above, I would be willing to get a universal machine if both formats are going to be around for a while, provided such machine is high quality and supports all functions (current machines don't meet either criteria).
I am not happy with Sony because of its half-assed support of certain new formats/product lines it has produced in recent times. This is particularly frustrating because the company, until recently, set high standards for product support, quality, etc.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "B-D discs are easier to damage physically"--you've done stress tests? - Larry I 13:07:47 08/21/07 (0)