In Reply to: I was not an early adopter of SACD or DVD-Audio posted by racerguy on September 28, 2007 at 17:59:50:
Ok, that's what it's all about. We're all after quality audio and video experience. We adopt the format(s) we think best deliver(s) that.
Never claimed SACD won anything although it did do better than DVD-A. Similarly, I've adopted blu-ray which I think is worth supporting over HD DVD for valid reasons you pretend don't exist.
You critize HD video formats for being niche even after you adopted two analogous audio formats which you understood will never be anything more than niche. Doesn't make sense to me, but to each his own.
You still seem angry about this fanboy stuff. Some people do like formats because of hype and I guess I can see how that might annoy you. I genuinely enjoy the quality.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- then why adopt at all? Clearly you enjoyed the quality - Jazz Inmate 23:24:39 09/28/07 (4)
- Why do you even need to ask such a question? - racerguy 08:24:12 09/29/07 (3)
- To make the point that it's about quality and nothing else - Jazz Inmate 09:12:57 09/29/07 (2)
- Nothing else? - racerguy 11:22:14 09/29/07 (1)
- nope. Otherwise you wouldn't have adopted SACD or DVD-A - Jazz Inmate 16:21:50 09/29/07 (0)