In Reply to: " ...you wanted the cheap player, casablanca and matrix..." - 1 partial fact out of 3 assertions... posted by Audiophilander on December 10, 2007 at 23:21:11:
doesn't change my point one bit. You made a decision based on nothing of significance...a few titles you've probably seen dozens of times. Even if there were 10 hd dvd exclusives you wanted, or 20, you should have looked at the broader issues before adopting. You didn't. And that's cool. It's just that you cant admit it.BTW, I can't remember what HD DVDs you own because I don't care and it doesn't affect my point about your reasons for adopting and your ongoing stance that capacity isn't important. That stance is almost as weird as your compulsion to defend microsoft. Ah well...we all have our priorities.
-------------"I have found that if you love life, life will love you back." -Arthur Rubinstein (1887-1982)
Edits: 12/11/07
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: " ...you wanted the cheap player, casablanca and matrix..." - 1 partial fact out of 3 assertions... - Jazz Inmate 01:13:26 12/11/07 (24)
- I don't buy for theoretical capacity, I buy movies I want to watch in high definition. - Audiophilander 07:30:22 12/11/07 (5)
- Nothing theoretical about capacity. Do you also not care about it when buying a PC? - Jazz Inmate 12:53:57 12/11/07 (4)
- Capacity is an empty warehouse; theory is what you 'may' fill it up with. - Audiophilander 14:23:42 12/11/07 (3)
- No, capacity is the surface area for pits on the disc surface that you fill with digital information - Jazz Inmate 15:13:50 12/11/07 (2)
- I was speaking metaphorically, but we can talk about your skin complexion if you wish. - Audiophilander 17:21:15 12/11/07 (1)
- yeah, as I said, you used a bad metaphor - Jazz Inmate 17:37:57 12/11/07 (0)
- Title choice not significant????? - Jack G 07:00:48 12/11/07 (17)
- No--not at this stage. Studio backing is more significant - Jazz Inmate 10:01:41 12/11/07 (12)
- Only 100 titles? Where have you been? - Jack G 11:15:46 12/11/07 (11)
- When do you think Auph adopted HD DVD? - Jazz Inmate 12:01:43 12/11/07 (10)
- Not that long ago - Jack G 12:18:03 12/11/07 (9)
- "...a movie lover, not a format cheerleader." - Words I'd almost consider worthy of engraving ... - Audiophilander 12:48:14 12/11/07 (8)
- The latest BD talking point-Don't buy movies because you want to see them, buy to support the format - Jack G 13:23:09 12/11/07 (7)
- You already owned the movies. You're format whores NT - Jazz Inmate 15:47:54 12/11/07 (6)
- Actually, no very few are double dips - Jack G 18:54:28 12/11/07 (2)
- "very few "is the operative phrase - Jazz Inmate 23:46:45 12/11/07 (1)
- Then they deserve to be niche products (nt) - Jack G 13:36:10 12/12/07 (0)
- "You're format whores" - The 20 gigabyte question: Did SONY leave money on your bureau for services rendered? - Audiophilander 17:28:08 12/11/07 (2)
- nope...any other bright ideas, ho? NT - Jazz Inmate 17:39:26 12/11/07 (1)
- Well, at least an "HD-ho" isn't as distasteful as a... - Audiophilander 22:11:36 12/11/07 (0)
- Title choice is only good for immediate gratification. - oscar 07:17:05 12/11/07 (3)
- Without it, there's no reason to buy into either format - Jack G 07:45:45 12/11/07 (2)
- There are precious few titles of interest in either format, and you know it - Jazz Inmate 12:00:51 12/12/07 (1)
- Thats true - Jack G 13:10:45 12/12/07 (0)