In Reply to: When do you think Auph adopted HD DVD? posted by Jazz Inmate on December 11, 2007 at 12:01:43:
>>> Basing decisions on the available titles at a fixed point in time, early in format rollout, is completely nuts.<<<
No, basing decisions on titles that may never see the light of day is nuts.
>>>And this is where voting with your dollars comes into play. By jumping the fence from one side to the other, you are not telling the studios what format you prefer and you are encouraging the war rather than the format. Decide which is best and support it. Right now, neither format has the title availability to justify interest in terms of building a serious library.<<<
I'm telling the studios, that I'm a movie lover, not a format cheerleader.
Of course, that's why I still buy DVDs.
Jack
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Not that long ago - Jack G 12:18:03 12/11/07 (9)
- "...a movie lover, not a format cheerleader." - Words I'd almost consider worthy of engraving ... - Audiophilander 12:48:14 12/11/07 (8)
- The latest BD talking point-Don't buy movies because you want to see them, buy to support the format - Jack G 13:23:09 12/11/07 (7)
- You already owned the movies. You're format whores NT - Jazz Inmate 15:47:54 12/11/07 (6)
- Actually, no very few are double dips - Jack G 18:54:28 12/11/07 (2)
- "very few "is the operative phrase - Jazz Inmate 23:46:45 12/11/07 (1)
- Then they deserve to be niche products (nt) - Jack G 13:36:10 12/12/07 (0)
- "You're format whores" - The 20 gigabyte question: Did SONY leave money on your bureau for services rendered? - Audiophilander 17:28:08 12/11/07 (2)
- nope...any other bright ideas, ho? NT - Jazz Inmate 17:39:26 12/11/07 (1)
- Well, at least an "HD-ho" isn't as distasteful as a... - Audiophilander 22:11:36 12/11/07 (0)