In Reply to: Inferior?? That's a load of bull - at least it's complete posted by TK421 on December 17, 2007 at 06:03:44:
You should be asking why the vast majority of HD DVDs do not include lossless/uncompressed audio tracks...
That's a "factor" which could be a direct result of bandwidth/storage limitations. It's hit or miss (usually miss) whether any of the HD DVDs have lossless audio. In contrast, the Blu-ray exclusive studios are now releasing almost every Blu-ray movie with lossless/uncompressed audio.
I also don't particularly care for the relatively low bitrate video transfers typical of HD DVD encodes or a number of 25G Blu-ray encodes (re: probable storage issues).
If you want to disbelieve the bandwidth/storage issues, you can always blame the "inferior" PQ/SQ (collective assessment of a large survey of movie reviews by multiple reviewers) on "inferior" (?) movie production values by the HD DVD-supporting studios. This despite the fact that Warner Blu-ray/HD DVD movies have identical video encodes (hence identical PQ).
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "... Neither of these "advantages" has been a factor so far..." - oscar 07:14:17 12/17/07 (3)
- RE: "... Neither of these "advantages" has been a factor so far..." - Jack G 09:04:45 12/17/07 (2)
- You are correct the percentage of HD DVD with lossless is rising (but still not close to 100%). - oscar 18:25:06 12/17/07 (1)
- Re: - Jack G 04:52:56 12/18/07 (0)