In Reply to: I posted an example of a title that fit on one BD and required two separate HD DVDs posted by Jazz Inmate on December 20, 2007 at 13:57:40:
>>> "Oscar has cited numerous examples of BDs that have much higher bitrates than their HD DVD counterparts. You continue to ignore all salient points and just focus on mind-numbing insults." <<<
Don't blame Oscar for your f*ck-up. We aren't talking about opinions in respect to bit-rates provided by second hand sources. I want FACTS. If you can't provide clear A/B comparisons that you yourself have conducted, then your advocacy of Blu-ray is as phony as your rhetoric.
>>> "Just go back and look through any of our threads last week, the week before or the weeks before to find valid points I made that you systematically ignored and replied with dumbass taunts while swearing up and down the board that you really did adopt HD DVD because of Casablanca." <<<
Valid points? ...! LOL! You have N-O-N-E. BTW, the exaggerated WHOPPERS you keep regurgitating must leave an awful taste in your mouth, but it can't be much worse than the Shinola you consume from SONY that keeps your pompoms waving in the breeze.
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I reiterate: show me the empirical data! - Audiophilander 14:43:40 12/20/07 (2)
- you have access to the same info I do, auph - Jazz Inmate 14:06:44 12/21/07 (1)
- LOL! The BS meter pegged maximum with your response this time. - Audiophilander 02:07:01 12/22/07 (0)