In Reply to: No. Charles Hansen predicted dire consequences for Blu-ray. Time will prove him right posted by Ray98@Walmart on February 19, 2008 at 04:44:03:
the realm of video and the high res audio will be dominated by the mass market companies. That is a fact I've observed for the past decade or so.
The reason is simple: money. Most high end companies are rather small and and have limited resources and manpower. People like Sony and Panasonic have access to hundreds of engineers and multi millions of dollars. High end companies can not even dream of matching salaries paid to top engineers of Cisco, Microsoft, Atari and others in the compute design and software field. A great engineer employed by those companies probably earns more than the heads of most 'high end' companies. Just where do you suppose the brightest and most talented designers from universities and colleges are going to seek work, you suppose?
A high end company can not afford to commission proprietary specialty chips: the return on the investment is simply too small to justify the cost. While high end audio likes to see itself as catering to the elite and being a leader in technology, the sheer size of the high end market is too small and consumers are probably more worried about appearance and prestige than true performance.
The digital/video field simply moves far too quickly for the typical high end company to probably even keep abreast. The last really high end attempts in the venue were the development of the Ultra analog chip, now basically extinct, and the development of the HDCD by Keith Johnson and Reference Recordings, now a foot note in the history of digital. At the time of introduction both were quite an improvement, I thought, but their failure simply points out the limited scope of the penetration of the high end into a mass market commodity.
The sweeping success of MP-3 and the ipod further demonstrates that the masses are not so concerned with extreme fidelity as they are with convenience and cost. The proliferation of the Chinese audio invasion further demonstrates the public's preoccupation with low cost.
Dvds may be very popular in China, but at $1 per disc, jewel box extra, most studios are not profiting from its proliferation. The public may also will put up with the video taped versions of movies, but as the Chinese economy develops a middle class they too will want a better disc.
Remember, high res video is the provenance of an owner of a larger TV set. I believe in the US 50 inch screens are now rapidly becoming the norm. If the prevailing set size in China is 20 inch, high res is not really viable, simply because of the size of the set. High res video simply does not make much of a difference.
Surround sound similarly was not important in Europe and Japan, again because homes were smaller and thus the typical consumer had no need of a sound system that was larger in presentation than what the TV set can provide. Now that Plasma and LCD's are common place and significantly more affordable, surround sound is making significant inroads into those foreign markets.
Blue ray penetration into the market is highly dependent on the size of the screen you watch. The size of the screen is determined by the general economic status of the individual. Prices are dropping rapidly, however, so you will see a proliferation of larger and larger sets. Prices are also dropping significantly for Blu ray machines, and I see machines in the under $400 price category already, and I am not consciously trying to keep up with the technology.
This places further strain on the resources of the high end. While Ed Meitner has been able to do it, it was only with the cooperation of Sony. Sony considers itself to be high end. Their excellent high end ES CD transports have never really been released to the general high end manufacturers. As one Sony administrator I spoke to commented: "why bother with the flies around a cow when you can get the whole cow itself?"
Stu
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Unfortunately - unclestu52 11:33:59 02/20/08 (0)