In Reply to: "HD-DVD Lost, but Did Blu-ray Win?" A lengthy article with great good sense. posted by clarkjohnsen on April 13, 2008 at 10:58:42:
What its going to take is for the price of the disks to come down under $20. I have not yet bought a BD player for that reason. I dont want to pay 30-40 bucks per disk, when SD DVDs look so good on my 50" Panasonic plasma. Also, number of titles is still limited. Give me LOTR and the first SW trilogy, and I would pay 40/disk, but not for garden variety movies.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "HD-DVD Lost, but Did Blu-ray Win?" A lengthy article with great good sense. - Hornlover 08:29:24 04/14/08 (4)
- You make a good point... - Crazyhorse 04:59:38 04/15/08 (1)
- "is the average consumer going to notice a difference between SD and hi-def on his 42" screen?" Of course... - Jazz Inmate 11:22:44 04/15/08 (0)
- Blu-ray is not $30-$40 per disc - Jazz Inmate 22:06:26 04/14/08 (1)
- RE: Blu-ray is not $30-$40 per disc - Hornlover 08:26:49 04/15/08 (0)