In Reply to: The BDP-550 is a stopgap... posted by oscar on June 23, 2009 at 14:21:55:
If so, that is a problem for sure. Audio seems to work much better via HDMI for the lesser-priced players, I have been quite happy with it in general, never thought I would be.People say the Oppo BDP-83 has a half-decent analog section. But at $500, and I don't know of any cheaper for "good", that is somewhat out of the price range the OP wanted. Also, Denon is coming out very shortly with a $500 BDP that will be very close in features (and analog section) to the Oppo...presume it will street in the $400 ballpark. They will have another model that's $800 IIRC that's supposed to kick it up a notch. So it looks like $500 is the entry MSRP for a BDP with attention paid to the analog section.
Personally, at this point, I prefer NOT to pay for an analog section in a BDP, nor a multi-ch input analog section in an AVR/pre-pro. Because they cost a lot to be good, and they both have to be good to make it worthwhile. Whereas HDMI is cheap, keep the audio digital as long as possible...but give me a great AVR analog output section. I prefer to keep my analog source signals totally out of any digital processor box.
Edits: 06/23/09
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Do you mean sound via the analog outputs? - cfraser 18:49:59 06/23/09 (5)
- "I prefer to keep my analog source signals totally out of any digital processor box. " - oscar 05:33:00 06/24/09 (4)
- I think you and cfraser are saying pretty much the same thing - racerguy 06:34:09 06/24/09 (3)
- Yes, I think so - cfraser 10:44:54 06/24/09 (2)
- So if you use HDMI for your sound, don't you wind up going through the pre/pro's preamp anyway ? nt - oscar 08:53:24 06/28/09 (1)
- RE: So if you use HDMI for your sound, don't you wind up going through the pre/pro's preamp anyway ? nt - cfraser 14:33:33 06/29/09 (0)