In Reply to: I hate lcd TV's posted by Perfume on September 7, 2009 at 19:59:05:
PAINTING: "American Zenith, 1958"
Perfume,Rant: The problem is not television technology, which improves and lowers in cost daily, but the potentials for viewing. Though I saw a lot of TV as a tot, and have a pile of channels, I have increasingly less interest. Cable news is just crap, FOX "News" is a national embarrassment- friends in Europe honestly believe that either it's a deliberate parody or special programming for "special needs" people- and CNN unwatchable- the "floppy arm fear-o'-the day school of impressionistic journalism". I haven't watched network- except "The Simpsons"- for 25 years, but do watch a bit of arts, history, and science programming as well as movies.
The main problem is that these days, I can't tolerate 5 seconds of advertising anymore plus the constant shit run during the programmes and logos etc in the frame during movies. Even IFC, a long time holdout as a self-described defender of the pure movie experience runs ads during the movies and puts it's frucklin logo in the frame. The movie channels are nearly a complete waste and I'm thinking seriously of changing to 2-at-a-time Netflix. The only good feature of movie channels are those rare gems that I might not ever hear about. Though I have many friends with similar musical, automotive, artistic, and equipment tastes, only one also has a similar taste in movies.
I'm perhaps am not the most informed commentator on which TV to buy as the 32" Sony (2005) I have is only the third TV I've ever owned. It replaced a 27" Sony XBR of 1994 that went up in smoke with a Pioneer DVD player when the electrical contractor was working on the house- otherwise I'd probably be watching that one. The 32" cost about $550 and I think it's among the swan songs of the CRT- a very good picture, very good sound, plenty of inputs, many programmable features and adjustments including picture modes.
Therein's a very important lesson about television and monitor technology that it gets both better and cheaper, but when it is a good idea to change? In situations where an advanced technology is not strictly necessary, waiting to buy is like money in the bank,..
The Future: Despite my subject title, there has been superb programming and I think TV has a long, influential, and highly profitable future and when it grows up to be an adult, could be a positive force- but it's unlikely for a long time.
And though it will be along time before I replace the 32" Sony CRT- it's good enough for my use- I do keep a low-level watch on the various TV technologies and I have to say, Blu-Ray on a big plasma screen is amazingly good - the first time I saw it, I was drawn across the showroom floor from 50'- it was just that obviously better. The 1080 LCD's are getting to be very, very good, LED is promising, and even the giant LCD projection screens are becoming of acceptable quality. I well remember the horror of early front projection sets that were washed out if there was a candle burning in the neighbour's house and the image would disappear is you moved 8" off axis. Price is an important aspect for me and the plasma and LCD's continue to drop to being nearly attractive. When I can buy a 42" 1080 line panel for under $1,000- and Blu Ray survives- I might do it. -I remember fondly too when the first large Philips plasma cost $15,000.
As I'm typing, I'm watching on another of the last CRT monitors offered- a 22" NEC - about $450 in 2006. Computers monitors are clearly a realm where I can't see any benefit of any kind to CRT- go directly to LCD. I spend a lot of time with CAD and my next monitor will be a 28" or larger LCD- those will have to improve and drop a bit further in price.
As for adopting a new TV technology, I'll let that purchase be a celebration when my personal recession is over- and after a new computer monitor, new cartridge, new speakers, and new Jaguar roadster- which will have to be a used 2014 model. By that calculation, I'll probably be on the market fro a new TV in about 10 years,..
Happy hunting!
Cheers,
Bambi B
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Who would waste money on a new "Television" ? A completely dead medium ! - Bambi B 05:37:27 09/08/09 (40)
- It's good to hear ... - Bhasi 01:06:43 09/09/09 (0)
- The economy is propped up by advertising... - Paul_A 15:53:30 09/08/09 (0)
- Before CNN replaced the 'O'Briens' it was a decent source for real news in the morning. - powermatic 12:33:36 09/08/09 (16)
- "Seriously, who watches a program like 'Two And A Half Men'?" - Wendell Narrod 13:01:43 09/08/09 (15)
- Me too. - Dave Pogue 16:52:57 09/08/09 (1)
- RE: Me too. - Wendell Narrod 16:54:04 09/08/09 (0)
- RE: "Seriously, who watches a program like 'Two And A Half Men'?" - geoffkait 14:53:04 09/08/09 (10)
- I wonder if men who watch that program aren't - keith_d 18:31:37 09/08/09 (4)
- "Just dreaming of a bevy of hookers...by association. " - Wendell Narrod 18:56:31 09/08/09 (3)
- My point is: I'd be very surprised if I were to find that program funny or entertaining - keith_d 06:34:17 09/09/09 (2)
- RE: My point is: I'd be very surprised if I were to find that program funny or entertaining - Dave Pogue 18:34:44 09/09/09 (1)
- You not only listen to Gallo... - keith_d 19:14:46 09/09/09 (0)
- If "funny" means the most patently obvious sex-related "jokes" - powermatic 15:35:28 09/08/09 (4)
- You aren't alone. - Jack Seaton 21:58:20 11/09/09 (0)
- RE: If "funny" means the most patently obvious sex-related "jokes" - Wendell Narrod 15:45:36 09/08/09 (2)
- RE: It's just TV - powermatic 15:57:48 09/08/09 (1)
- RE: It's just TV - geoffkait 18:19:41 09/08/09 (0)
- You've got the courage of your convictions. For myself, staring blankly off into space for 30 minutes - powermatic 13:16:11 09/08/09 (1)
- I'm just a simple guy and enjoy comedy. - Wendell Narrod 13:18:01 09/08/09 (0)
- There's incredible stuff on the new, over the air digital channels - keith_d 09:57:58 09/08/09 (0)
- RE: Who would waste money on a new "Television" ? A completely dead medium ! - no1maestro 08:54:02 09/08/09 (0)
- Not really pertinent to the OP's question, is it? - Wendell Narrod 08:42:32 09/08/09 (9)
- You're missing an important point - Jim Austin 11:11:55 09/08/09 (4)
- RE: You're missing an important point - Wendell Narrod 12:59:01 09/08/09 (3)
- Pssst. Wendell. It's JoshT over here. - JoshT 13:25:15 09/08/09 (1)
- RE: Pssst. Wendell. It's JoshT over here. - Wendell Narrod 13:28:45 09/08/09 (0)
- No offense taken - Jim Austin 13:25:09 09/08/09 (0)
- So what? Its a decent comment; don't like, don't read. - free.ranger 10:48:26 09/08/09 (1)
- RE: So what? Its a decent comment; don't like, don't read. - Wendell Narrod 12:47:59 09/08/09 (0)
- RE: In reality I think it was right on the money - jtkarma 09:47:13 09/08/09 (1)
- Really? - Wendell Narrod 09:48:54 09/08/09 (0)
- I completely agree with your assessment of ... - Mike K 08:36:28 09/08/09 (8)
- RE: I completely agree with your assessment of ... - acres verde 13:46:50 09/08/09 (2)
- Do what I do. - Wendell Narrod 13:55:03 09/08/09 (1)
- RE: Do what I do. - audioAl 11:31:04 09/09/09 (0)
- A point of (slight) disagreement... - Jim Austin 11:07:55 09/08/09 (4)
- RE: A point of (slight) disagreement... - Dawnrazor 12:43:48 09/08/09 (3)
- Habit I guess - Jim Austin 13:26:59 09/08/09 (2)
- RE: Habit I guess - Dawnrazor 14:09:37 09/08/09 (1)
- Good suggestion - Jim Austin 14:12:48 09/08/09 (0)