In Reply to: RE: "Seriously, who watches a program like 'Two And A Half Men'?" posted by geoffkait on September 8, 2009 at 14:53:04:
humanly possibly, yeah, it's a damn laff riot.
TV long ago left the comparatively subtle world of sexual innuendo or double entendre-much less nuance-long, long ago. Remember when 'Married With Children' seemed risque? As stupid as that program was, in retrospect it seems like a gently subtle send-up of suburban life. Now it's more or less a constant string of 'I'm soaking wet', 'yeah, that's what she said' add-laugh-track "humor". I'd call it sophomoric, but I wouldn't want to insult second-year college students. Or second year high school students. Or second year grade school students.
Go nuts if you think it's so hilarious. And I'll admit, I never watch it, so maybe I missed all those really, really funny episodes.
"dammit"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- If "funny" means the most patently obvious sex-related "jokes" - powermatic 15:35:28 09/08/09 (4)
- You aren't alone. - Jack Seaton 21:58:20 11/09/09 (0)
- RE: If "funny" means the most patently obvious sex-related "jokes" - Wendell Narrod 15:45:36 09/08/09 (2)
- RE: It's just TV - powermatic 15:57:48 09/08/09 (1)
- RE: It's just TV - geoffkait 18:19:41 09/08/09 (0)