In Reply to: Partly because they've redefined "burn-in" posted by cfraser on October 11, 2009 at 16:25:58:
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- LCDs also suffer from image retention (nt) - racerguy 06:45:29 10/13/09 (15)
- RE: LCDs also suffer from image retention (nt) - Gmood1 09:47:48 10/13/09 (14)
- I've seen it quite a bit - racerguy 19:04:00 10/13/09 (10)
- RE: I've seen it quite a bit - Gmood1 20:40:09 10/13/09 (9)
- RE: I've seen it quite a bit - racerguy 21:10:04 10/13/09 (8)
- RE: I've seen it quite a bit - Gmood1 21:21:56 10/13/09 (7)
- You are definitely confused - racerguy 04:56:41 10/14/09 (6)
- RE: You are definitely confused - Gmood1 08:03:31 10/14/09 (5)
- I'm through with you - racerguy 14:52:24 10/14/09 (1)
- RE: I'm through with you - Gmood1 18:30:36 10/14/09 (0)
- you might want to consider this - Joe Murphy Jr 09:29:39 10/14/09 (2)
- RE: you might want to consider this - Gmood1 10:42:57 10/14/09 (1)
- you didn't offend me - Joe Murphy Jr 13:42:19 10/15/09 (0)
- brown-in is their burn-in - Joe Murphy Jr 13:32:11 10/13/09 (2)
- RE: brown-in is their burn-in - Gmood1 14:30:57 10/13/09 (1)
- not burning in - Joe Murphy Jr 18:20:38 10/13/09 (0)