In Reply to: precursor to blu audio posted by Joe Murphy Jr on May 18, 2010 at 21:59:04:
Hmmm, sure wish that was 24/96 stereo. I always got/get annoyed when DVD-A is 24/48...sure it's "high resolution", but low bit-rate. I mean when we can already get 24/192 stereo tracks. I still mostly prefer to play the stereo tracks over the (lossless) surround tracks when I have a choice. A really good pop/rock surround mix that isn't gimmicky is still a rare thing IMO.Do I need anything special/new to play 3.0 Blu?
I always thought Petty/Heartbreakers CDs sounded pretty good, certainly well above average for the "pop" genre. They have a certain clarity to them that I like.
Edits: 05/18/10
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: precursor to blu audio - cfraser 23:06:52 05/18/10 (9)
- Actually. . . - Chris from Lafayette 09:21:40 05/20/10 (2)
- I mis-spoke there - cfraser 12:22:54 05/20/10 (1)
- samples greater than bits - Joe Murphy Jr 21:57:51 05/20/10 (0)
- the source - Joe Murphy Jr 15:55:46 05/19/10 (5)
- RE: the source - cfraser 18:11:18 05/19/10 (4)
- RE: the source - Hwkn 18:52:51 05/19/10 (3)
- RE: the source - cfraser 19:29:18 05/19/10 (2)
- sample rate - Joe Murphy Jr 21:24:39 05/19/10 (1)
- Now they go and do something sensible like that... - cfraser 12:14:21 05/20/10 (0)