In Reply to: the source posted by Joe Murphy Jr on May 19, 2010 at 15:55:46:
True. But if they have lossless for the surround master, one might expect... Didn't mean to sound so negative about it all, but 24/48 stereo isn't really much better than a CD, and has much more limited playability. I have a preference for sample rate over the bit depth, to tell the truth, if I had to choose one over the other...but we don't really have to choose with BD for any technical reason.Obviously the selling point is the lossless surround track, but I just wish they'd truly consider the *audiophiles*, as inferred in the link, and offer high quality stereo instead of something that's really more for the AV/HT-philes who are most likely set up to play lossless surround. I guess it makes marketing sense though, considering most people (maybe not here) buy BDPs for video.
P.S. now that I think of it, how was the audio on the R30 BD? I only have the DVD, still thinking of "upgrading" even though they omitted the decent 2ch DVD audio track on the BD. I like that concert footage better than S&A's, shows more interesting close-ups of the band etc., more musician action and less crowd. Think I like the music selection overall better too.
Edits: 05/19/10 05/19/10
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: the source - cfraser 18:11:18 05/19/10 (4)
- RE: the source - Hwkn 18:52:51 05/19/10 (3)
- RE: the source - cfraser 19:29:18 05/19/10 (2)
- sample rate - Joe Murphy Jr 21:24:39 05/19/10 (1)
- Now they go and do something sensible like that... - cfraser 12:14:21 05/20/10 (0)