In Reply to: RE: That's a very bold statement... posted by stehno on March 5, 2015 at 21:36:11:
Disregard any more statements from you. For someone to post "BTW, there is no such thing as a "high quality" surround sound playback system." bespeaks an incredible ignorance and hubris on your part. I see a lot of that from 2-channel snobs, and you are clearly one of those.You also wrote: "And if the distortions induced by our electronics are so severe as to raise the noise floor so high that only a small percentage of all the music info embedded in the recording are audible (while the vast majority of music info remains inaudible due to the severity of the unversal distortions plaguing every last playback system)"
How in the world did you come to this knowledge? You must have some seriously deficient gear if "the vast majority" of your music is inaudible due to "distortions plaguing" your system. You strike me as a hand-wringing crackpot of the 1st order.
Good day to you, "sir"...
-RW-
Edits: 03/06/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Okay, now I know I can safely.... - rlw 05:32:21 03/06/15 (9)
- RE: Okay, now I know I can safely.... - stehno 02:43:55 03/07/15 (8)
- Okay, point by pioint.... - rlw 07:26:24 03/07/15 (7)
- Now I can safely disregard anything you say... - stehno 11:15:34 03/07/15 (6)
- An interesting experiemnt... - rlw 06:38:54 03/08/15 (5)
- RE: An interesting experiemnt... - stehno 14:25:32 03/08/15 (3)
- Yes, a CD vetted by you would be of interest! - rlw 10:49:19 03/11/15 (2)
- RE: Yes, a CD vetted by you would be of interest! - stehno 17:34:45 03/19/15 (0)
- RE: Yes, a CD vetted by you would be of interest! - stehno 17:41:41 03/11/15 (0)
- RE: An interesting experiemnt... - stehno 11:07:18 03/08/15 (0)