In Reply to: RE: Plasma TV posted by mrdavis842 on February 16, 2016 at 14:07:50:
Okay, here we go again. The claim is absurd on its face. Had Pioneer stayed in the plasma business for four more years and advanced their technology, how much better would they have been than Panny?!? The ONLY thing you can claim is that the final versions of the Panny were only as good as a four year old Pioneer! That is not something I'd be crowing about.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Plasma TV - Sondek 14:26:11 02/16/16 (5)
- RE: Plasma TV - mrdavis842 18:45:19 02/16/16 (4)
- RE: Plasma TV - Sondek 06:05:35 02/17/16 (3)
- RE: Plasma TV - mrdavis842 10:44:59 02/17/16 (2)
- RE: Plasma TV - Sondek 15:54:07 02/17/16 (1)
- RE: Plasma TV - mrdavis842 08:46:48 02/18/16 (0)