In Reply to: RE: Plasma TV posted by Sondek on February 16, 2016 at 14:26:11:
"The ONLY thing you can claim is that the final versions of the Panny were only as good as a four year old Pioneer!"
LOL, that IS the ONLY claim made by all those reviewers - that Panasonic had equalled in a couple of areas and SURPASSED in several the Pioneer Kuros. What is absurd is that you are now trying to change that fact with a "what if" question that is pointless. If Pioneer had stayed in the business and had made a better plasma than Panasonics Viera then no one would have made the claim. LOL
You were proven wrong in the 2014 post and you are still wrong. No matter how you spin it, "it was a 4 year old TV or what if Pioneer had stayed in the business", the conclusion remains the same - Panasonic Vieras equalled or bettered Pioneer Kuros. Nothing to argue about, it has been proven both subjectively and objectively. It is what it is.
The good news is that there will be a replacement for our plasmas that already has better picture quality than a plasma and the [OLED] technology will continue to get even better and I'm crowing about that.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Plasma TV - mrdavis842 18:45:19 02/16/16 (4)
- RE: Plasma TV - Sondek 06:05:35 02/17/16 (3)
- RE: Plasma TV - mrdavis842 10:44:59 02/17/16 (2)
- RE: Plasma TV - Sondek 15:54:07 02/17/16 (1)
- RE: Plasma TV - mrdavis842 08:46:48 02/18/16 (0)