In Reply to: I would wait... posted by KeithR on April 10, 2001 at 11:44:51:
>>Arcam has never ventured into HTI'm sorry, but the D.A.V.E. system has won many accolades from the "published" reviewers, as you would say. Also, it competes with much more expensive gear on HT. The AVR is just a baby D.A.V.E. that is $2,000 less.
I could argue the fact that the Arcam is not as good on HT, but it wouldn't do any good. All the "published reviewers" say that it is sub-par, but I'd put mine against ANYTHING in the price range on HT.
And the musicality speaks for itself. .
B
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Well. . . - Hantra 11:52:48 04/10/01 (3)
- Here is my point... - KeithR 14:18:01 04/10/01 (2)
- OK, I see. . . - Hantra 14:23:47 04/10/01 (1)
- Lost of options - KeithR 16:27:20 04/10/01 (0)