 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: For more comprehensive viewpoints with less overt spoilers... posted by Audiophilander on August 01, 2002 at 20:38:09:
Well that's very comforting. But Duncan Shepherd and I, we prefer the weird and excellent stuff so long as it's not shot on video.Oh, "80%" favorable? I checked out the "favorable" EW review by the usually critical Owen Gleiberman. He gave it a rousing B-! Time methinks to toss the Rotten Tomato.
clark
Follow Ups:
... the typically overcritical Christopher Kelly who rarely likes anything but the most eclectic art-house fare gave Signs a four star review. That may or may not be good as an endorsement of the film since he knocks just about every film, even those I like, but M. Night Shymalan's track record suffices for me to want see the film before rendering an assessment.The fact that you and Duncan Shepherd like the weird stuff doesn't especially inspire confidence in my desire to spend money. Excellence is another matter and, arguably, one of individual tastes; I haven't compared Mr Shepherd's track record with my own, so I can't speak to his tastes, but I'll gladly express my own preferences and review Signs as well, once I've seen the movie.
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
