|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
128.252.39.161
'); } // End --> |
In Reply to: You don't think that intentions are *implicit* to works of art? posted by rhizomatic on March 17, 2005 at 10:25:44:
I mean both critics' opinions and whatever we can say that Eastwood's 'intentions' may have been.
______________________________
Stranger than that, we're alive!Whatever you think it's more than that, more than that.
Follow Ups:
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: