|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
207.81.84.149
'); } // End --> |
In Reply to: Re: George A Romero's "Land of the Dead" posted by PCL on June 26, 2005 at 08:18:48:
Well thank heaven for DVD. I think the studio wants a fast paced edit for the low attention span masses.I never understood the length complaint of Dawn of the Dead which was IMO the best of this series. It was also the longest - but it served its characters and mood well. It's one of the only horror films I can watch over and over again -- and given the production values even then, that says something. There are a few good jumps in this one as well but it's never really been about theat. The scariest thing of all is fear itself and how the human survivors act. This in Land of the Dead has been retained thankfully.
Simon Pegg of Shawn of the Dead (this was a hoot) had a cameo but I missed it.
Follow Ups:
Yes, I thought 'DotD' was strong, all things considered (era, budget etc). Too bad about the remake, which my friend (who's a diehard Dead fan) dragged me to see. I didn't hate it, but it certainly didn't have many layers to enjoy, compared to the original.I think Simon Pegg's cameo was the scene where people were having their pictures taken with captured zombies.
I actually liked the Dawn Re-make as a straight ahead actuion horror. It's not terribly insightful like the original. Still it was fun in a theme-park ride kind of way -- the opening 10 minutes was strong. Some of the characters were utterly unconvincing card board characters -- and too many of them.I'm going to see Land tomorrow again with someone else so I'll look closer at the picture scene (which was kind of funny). Now Romero needs to make Twilight of the Dead, Country of the Dead, Planet of the Dead. You can never have too many zombies -- if this makes some money they may give him an even bigger budget for another one.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: