 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
70.152.116.69
In Reply to: Re: PS3 posted by Jack G on February 25, 2006 at 09:07:03:
They can't control DVD anymore and the DVD cash bubble is losing its air. They need a new revenue stream and better copy protection. Then there's that whole interactive/special features BS that they say people want. And since the new players will play DVDs, you will see a gradual decline in DVD player and DVD software production (think VHS, CD, VCRs and CD players). Both formats also have hybrid capabilities (DVD and Blu-Ray or HD-DVD on the same disc), so this can be used to eliminate multiple inventories of the same movie.I'm obviously not part of their target audience: all I want is the movie encoded with lossless audio and 16+Mb/s 1920x1080p VC-1 or H.264 AP video. I'm even willing to pay retail to have this without so much as one director's commentary, actor's interview, slide show, game demo or interactive capability. I just want the best audio and video quality that the next gen format is capable of delivering. I'm not interested in the rest of the crap they want to cram on the disc (a contributing reason why DVD is not as good as it could be).
Follow Ups:
Yea, but I'm not convinced these formats wont be stillborn. I doubt the masses will care, even if they know about the new formats. Most think DVDs are hi-def. DVDs are still high profit, so we'll see if they drop their cash cow. Yea, they could go the hybrid route, but then, they could have done that with SACDs too.
While it would be nice to have some 720 or 1080 duscs, and I have a TV that would show them well, I'm going to wait untill things get sorted out before I jump in.
we'll see.
Jack
It won't be stillborn, but acceptance will depend on how it's presented. I believe the average consumer will appreciate the difference in video quality when HD is compared to DVD. However, it needs to be done correctly (ie; let a videophile do the company's marketing while the marketing department cleans the toilets).I think High Resolution audio hit a brick wall because it was marketed poorly, the average person doesn't appreciate it, doesn't want to spend money on quality audio and, the biggest reason, they prefer the portability feature of MP3 audio/players. Besides, they get a lot of it for free. The sense of vision translates better to them than the sense of sound. And their reasoning: why spend $20 on an SACD or DVD-A (which includes so much non-Pop music) when you can get a DVD for $14.99 at Wal-Mart?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
