|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.224.136.219
'); } // End --> |
In Reply to: Scientists respond to An Inconvenient Truth posted by clarkjohnsen on June 15, 2006 at 09:28:21:
I see you are on a roll..
How droll... That article is a nice piece of propaganda. WHich is a polite way to say it, and you, are full of it.Real science is done by the book; well,by the journal. One of the guys quoted asserted, in effect, that he had a counterexample. That is a devastating and permanent end for any theory. Where is his journal article? Where is the discussion of it in the literature? A search will reveal about a thousand journal articles on GW, and not a counterexample in the lot.
The gold standard in science is prediction. The GW guys predicted warming, and we got warming.
And now we find out the rate at which things are warming is accelerating.But I can see why a phony expose by a PR firm would appeal to you.
Follow Ups:
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: