Films/DVD Asylum

If you can't see that they are simply telling you things without coming anyhwere close to being close to

71.251.69.149

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Films/DVD Asylum ]

sjb

(A)

In Reply to: Re: Seems you expect more realism from Casino Royale than this "documentary." ;-) posted by RGA on December 25, 2006 at 00:45:38:

providing actual evidence then I don't know what to say. To argue back that my disappointment with how poorly they support their argument means that I believe the government's version of the events of that day is just silly and shows that you can't really support anything they're saying. I also can't help but notice that you didn't address any of the several points I made in two posts about the sloppiness of their presentation.
To say that questions should be asked is obvious. I said so myself in my first response.
Also, I truly believe that pursuing these kinds of silly theories
Don't piss on my shoe and tell me it's raining.

actually helps shield the administration from proper scrutiny. (Open in New Window)

Follow Ups:

Re: If you can't see that they are simply telling you things without coming anyhwere close to being close to - RGA 04:03:15 12/29/06 (0)
The problem is that when people are called whackos for suggesting a plane did not hit the Pentagon is doing the real disservice. Why won't the government simply show the video footage? Unless in fact they are trying to cover up the fact that no plane hit it.
Why does flight 93 have a confirmed landing at another airport - Why is the wreckage so appalingly light, why did WTC number 7 fall down? I mean that is probably the biggest head scratcher of all -- man those New York builders must be the worst in the world - I know Aerican cars are bad but geez must be the worst carpenters, builders and engineers on the planet.
It boils down to ludicrous explanations -- no way did those planes vaporize and no way do those towers fall down from Jet fuel and paper after an hour when a freaking B52 Bomber hits the Empire State Building and not only did that burn longer and hotter it is a weaker structure and it's still up.
The makers of the film are not saying they have the answer -- they just don't buy the canned government response -- they hypothesize that gee maybe it was a cruise missile because it is the same general size. The news reports had totally different eyewitness accounts -- some paid lackies? Who knows but it's a pretty big difference going from jet liner to small craft depending on who said what that day. Not to mention all the second third etc explosions everyone was hearing.
We're to believe that a bunch of apes with box cutters managed to take down 4 planes? If I was one of those planes I would have taken a pen and jabbed it into the guy's throat or eyeball and taken them down (and I'm not even American). Sorry I don't but the BS the gov't is doling out. That does not make the filmaker's 100% correct but there is a lot of smoke there that the government could clear up but isn't -- and why not? Please don't say National Security -- if there was any National Security 9/11 would not have happened!

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

The Cable Cooker

You can not post to an archived thread.