|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Did Leonard Maltin actually SEE all the movies he lists in his bestselling 'Movie And Video Guide'?? posted by Vic T. on December 26, 2001 at 20:23:13:
For detail and sophistication, the Martin-Porter guide pales besides the
Maltin guide. If you're skeptical, try reading the reviews of
several of the alltime great films in each guide and compare them -
Citizen Kane, Gone With The Wind, Casablanca,
The Godfather, Lawerence of Arabia, etc. I recommend the Martin-
Porter Guide as a supplement because it can compensate for some of
the conservative, family oriented bias of Matlin. Just compare Matlin's review of "Alien", which he found repugnant, most
likely for the chest-bursting scene. In contrast, Martin-Porter gives
"Alien", the positive, enthusiatic review it so richly deserves. I
don't think that Bill Warren, the sci-fi editor for
Maltin, would have ever gave the film such a negative review. That review
probably came from Old Malty himself, so my advice is to have both
(and possibly more) guides on hand for reference. - AH
Follow Ups:
My reference shelf also includes guides by Steven Scheuer, Danny Peary, Joe Bob Briggs (hilarious), the "Psychotronic Video Guide", Ephraim Katz's "Film Encyclopedia" and of course one must have Halliwell.
Peary is on my sh*t list cause of his negative review of "Forbidden
Planet"; used to have reference to the monumental ten volume set,
"The Motion Picture Guide", unfortunately, it only went up to 1973. Psychotronics is pretty cool. - AH
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: