|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
Ok, thought I'd surprise the wife this Friday, so I borrowed the Viewsonic PJ550 from work & bought Lord of the Rings on DVD. Beat her home, plugged the Panny 56 in to the projector via S-video (don't have component cables lying about), stuck the projector on a table & took a second to focus it reasonably on the bare wall.What was her reaction that night when the movie started? She was awe struck & found both the picture & the sound much better than in the theater. Came home from a hard day's work Saturday night to find her having rented The Horse Whisperer so we could also enjoy it on the wall.
3 questions:
1) What have I done??
2) Anyone familiar with the PJ550? I like the idea of component inputs, but haven't really compared a good DLP PJ against this LCD in our home (duh...first time bringing a PJ home). The retail on the lamp seems extreme ($450 =/-) but the picture even via S-video is quite nice.
3) How much better would the picture via component really have been? I've been toying with trying an Infocus 340 or 350, but neither have comonent inputs.
Follow Ups:
Methinks she is reacting to the SIZE (of the picture ;-)With a good screen and setup properly, projectors can look decent. BUT, few people do the job right, cutting corners instead. As a result they look washed out and fuzzy compared to a good movie theatre. However, if you don't have a decent movie theatre in town, then it does not take much to better it.
With a progressive scan DVD and line doubler, yes component looks even better.
the answers to the problems are in the back of the "teacher's edition"ie
1) ...the horror...
2) ...the horror...
3) ...the horror...
the trigram is fulfilling:the moving line is favorable
no fault
follow your buddah nature
everything is fine with the universe
your rice bowl overflows
great sex
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: