|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: $1000 receiver dilemma: Marantz, NAD, Denon posted by pcalvin on January 21, 2003 at 21:25:19:
Forget the NAD, that company has all sorts of quality control issues. For HT, the Denon 3803 is an outstanding value. If you are more concerned with pure 2-channel listening, I would probably recommend the Marantz.
Follow Ups:
Can you elaborate on the quality control issue a little bit?I'm also considering a NAD and from what I've seen so far, they seem to be of exceptional quality. Simplistic design with a great power source.
I have spoken to several local audio retailers (some who currently offer NAD, some who have dumped NAD) and friends who have tried NAD products. I have also read countless posts on various audio forums regarding NAD products. The general consensus is that NAD "appears" to offer good value. Unfortunately, their products have a history of repair that most people find troubling. This should not be surprising...think about it for a minute. By focusing on audio separates, NAD competes in an arena reserved for high-end players. However, because NAD's retail prices are lower than the competition it should be expected that sacrifices (i.e., "cutting corners") are being made during the manufacturing process. Those sacrifices ultimately present themselves in the form of inexpensive materials, mediocre workmanship, middle-of-the-road technology, etc.The purchase of audio equipment can represent a substantial investment...one that should last a long time. Therefore, my suggestion is this --- if you are serious enough about audio and HT to commit yourself to separates...definitely the way to go if your budget permits...spend a little more and buy something that will pass the "test of time".
Regards.......Peter
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: