|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Why is 2.35:1 so overused on DVDs? posted by Carl Eber on December 17, 2001 at 20:07:50:
I did not see "The Phantom Menace" at a theater and can't confirm your observations as to whether the aspect ratio was 1.85 or 2.35, however, my American Cinematographer Manual lists 2.35 as being a Cinemascope AND Panavision standard format. It is possible that the movie was released diferent formats depending upon whether the theater uses anamorphic projection lenses or not. A standard "squeezed" (anamorphic) release print for Panvision is 2.35:1 while an unsqueezed 70mm release print is 2.2:1.Lastly, the are approximately 10 film formats listed in the manual. Many, like Todd-AO and Cinerama, are no longer used, however, of the 10, three use the 2.35:1 ratio, four use 2.2:1, and two use 1.85:1, while the last (television production) is lised as 1.33:1. Of the formats listed, the most popular currently for motion picture production is the Panavision 35 system which is 2.35:1 format. Perhaps that is why the majority of DVDs are released in the 2.35:1 format. But, that's only speculation on my part.
Follow Ups:
"Lawrence of Arabia" was originally released in 70mm Super-Panavision with 6 track sound. It was shot with a 65mm "non-squeezed" Super Panavision system (same as Todd-AO), and originally released to theaters as a 70mm non-squeezed print. Subsequent releases of the film were done with 35mm 2:1 squeeze prints. So, depending upon whether the DVD was made from an original 70mm print (doubtful) or from a 35mm release print, the aspect ratio can vary. However, the fact that the original sound track was 6-track allowed the film to be successfully converted to surround sound.
Bravo, I love this stuff! Finally someone who knows what I'm talking about here...Thanks much Xenon, I bet you're a bright guy, :-))
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: