 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: The Final Word: posted by Rich on December 22, 2001 at 17:06:09:
Actually the Kodak site (and it's out-of-context quote in this thread) claim "2.4:1" (and this is NOT Tattersall's own quote, but Kodak's, within the context of this brief article), so I guess even if there's a possiblity that it was shot (together with all the complete CG frames such as the Pod Race that didn't originate in the natural world through a film camera) wider than 1.85:1......then 2.35:1 must NOT be "original apsect ratio" after all, not that any of this matters to you in the least, Morgan. Admit it, you haven't actually seen this movie in the theater, on broadcast tv, OR even the DVD...right? Or, I forgot, you don't have the gray matter to actually discuss anything relevant...So again, why the hell are you still in my thread? Your presence is repugnant Morgan...
Follow Ups:
might be something like:Dear CarlEber,
If stupidity was patentable, you'd be one of the world's richest men. Of course I shot Phantom Menace in a 2.35:1 aspect ratio. No, I don't think you have director potential. Directors need to be able to distinguish between 1.85:1 and 2.35:1. Good luck with your pig farming down there in Tennessee.
Respectfully yours
Tatersall
I don't farm at all, but I'd be willing to give your carreer a try...that of "renting" one's wife, sister, daughter, and mother out to crack dealers on street corners...sounds lucrative!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
