In Reply to: Re: Ô boy, I can take one ... posted by patrickU on October 15, 2003 at 08:41:11:
I was talking about the dialogue going out of its way to spell out the background history and contemporary context of the art. The example that I can think of is when Lee Krasner says something like, "Well, Jackson, this isn't really cubism because you're not breaking down the figure." Huh? I don't know anybody who might say anything that weirdly didactic to another artist. She goes--rather, Harris (or whoever adapted the script) has her go out of her way just to bring up this very miniature definition of cubism, in order to demonstrate how Pollock broke from it. And there's other instances of that throughout the film. It reminds me, like I said, of the scenes in Godard's movies where he has some character musing about the history of cinema or the effects of consumption or urban planning, or something, except in 'Pollock,' of course, it's not meant to be funny or self-conscious.I can imagine that you might've liked it for the same reasons I didn't, and much as I'm weirded out to admit it, I agree with Victor, I just find Pollock the man to be insufferable, and I probably didn't have any reason to expect the film to be any different.
What is your first language? German? You seem to have easy access to accent marks that don't appear on my keyboard...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "This isn't really cubism, Jackson..." - rhizomatic 08:53:39 10/15/03 (10)
- Re: "This isn't really cubism, Jackson..." - Dmitry 10:12:23 10/15/03 (8)
- Well, yeah... - rhizomatic 10:24:28 10/15/03 (7)
- Re: Well, yeah... - Dmitry 10:41:57 10/15/03 (4)
- Makes perfect sense to me! - rhizomatic 11:32:02 10/15/03 (3)
- that ain't nothin' - Dmitry 12:09:54 10/15/03 (2)
- Re: that ain't nothin' - patrickU 08:05:58 10/16/03 (0)
- Well, I'd see that. - rhizomatic 12:16:29 10/15/03 (0)
- Re: Well, yeah... - Bulkington 10:36:16 10/15/03 (0)
- Re: Well, yeah... - Dmitry 10:31:54 10/15/03 (0)
- Oh I see ! - patrickU 09:04:49 10/15/03 (0)