In Reply to: Agree completely posted by SR on October 17, 2003 at 11:33:14:
You know, the movie never explained why his splattered paint was considered art? Because Peggy Guggenheim thought so? That's part of the reason I went to see it. His work is like 20th Century composers--lost on me.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "untalented drunk", hmmmm . . . . - albee33 14:52:39 10/18/03 (1)
- If it's different, it must be art. - SR 11:58:30 10/20/03 (0)