In Reply to: His comment had NOTHING to do with the actor in question, ... posted by Audiophilander on February 1, 2002 at 11:01:51:
As I said - disingenuous, and you are not giving us anything different to chew on. Look at your previous posts if you forgot. You often bring political issues into discussions of films.That to me is not objectionable, as - as I said - anything related to the actors, films, stories can be discussed here. My only concern with your posts was in treating the political subjects as if it were the element of art.
The way I see it, a political aspect of a film story is fair game. A political affiliations and passions, the character and history of the makers of films - by all means. These all help us in understanding why and how.
So I really don't understand what makes you so sensitive all of a sudden. And especially playing the role of a forum cop - did I miss anyone appointing you?
I have not seem anyone abuse that yet here, to me some minor deviations from just the "straight movies" talk are OK and make this place more fun.
I thought that bit on Alda and ERA was interesting and fit well with my view of him.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: His comment had NOTHING to do with the actor in question, ... - Victor Khomenko 11:49:17 02/01/02 (6)
- Good grief man, can't you see the difference? - Audiophilander 12:49:17 02/01/02 (5)
- Re: Good grief man, can't you see the difference? - mikenyc 15:58:07 02/01/02 (4)
- Re: Good grief man, can't you see the difference? - AuPh 05:57:51 02/03/02 (3)
- Re: Good grief man, can't you see the difference? - mikenyc 06:46:34 02/03/02 (2)
- I see that you've chosen the dark side of the force. - AuPh 10:06:46 02/04/02 (1)
- Re: I see that you've chosen the dark side of the force. - mikenyc 14:34:30 02/04/02 (0)