In Reply to: Self-Absorbed Actors and their Worldviews posted by Jim Susky on February 4, 2002 at 22:23:46:
Heston's activity with NRA and the conservative movement is constantly mentioned, and I have no problem with that whatsoever. It completes the actor's personality sketch.So I am still rather annoyed by AuPh's insistance that he has right to mandate what side of actor's personality can or can not be covered here. I think that is simply improper and he should just read or ignore posts or posters he finds annoying to him.
As I said before, anything having to do with movie personalities is fair game for discussion - in my view, which I am not seeking to impose on anyone. If the discussion of Heston's political views took ten pages then I would say - enough already, but to jump like AuPh did at the small mention of Alda's silly statement was completely out of place.
So I don't see your point about Heston changing anything.
Now, this is a privately owned forum, and the owners can certainly step in and enforce the rules any way they see fit, but lacking that step I would say - just keep going: filmographies, divorces, extramarital affairs, education, background, political affiliations, families, commercial activities - all are of interest and can be covered.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Self-Absorbed Actors and their Worldviews - Victor Khomenko 04:44:45 02/05/02 (0)
- I didn't "mandate" anything, I just pointed out the disingenuousness... - AuPh 10:00:08 02/06/02 (1)
- Re: I didn't "mandate" anything, I just pointed out the disingenuousness... - Victor Khomenko 11:35:10 02/06/02 (0)