In Reply to: Defying logic is not a super power, Super Auph. posted by john dem on November 30, 2001 at 11:24:18:
>>> "Unable to defend even one silly TV show..." <<<Actually, I defended it sufficiently and moved on to the more troubling topic of your SF genre bashing.
>>> "... you first resort to personal insults, and now you try and establish that critics of SF are morally equivalent to racists." <<<
Wow! Sorry if I hurt the poster's feelings, but I'm amazed that making an assertion about limited imagination has penetrated the hide of such an unflappable critic! The latex applications actors wear when portraying aliens on Star Trek is a thicker skin.
As for my supposed efforts at painting SF's critics as being the moral equivalent of racists, that's a stretch. Yes, there are parallels with unreasonable genre bashing and racist-like behavior, but it isn't the same and I'm not making moral comparisons. When armchair SF critics condemn genre fiction they often resort to prejudicial comments about it's inferiority and the lack of sophistication of it's audience. They do this not out of the intuitiveness of their perception, but as a means of ridiculing that which they don't understand nor desire to understand, much less appreciate.
>>> "(Science fiction taken as a whole, is just as sophisticated as much of what passes for mainstream literature.) That's what I said." <<<
The difference is that my statement is intended as complimentary of the SF genre; your's, OTOH, implies that there's something inherently wrong with all of it.
My glass is at least half-full; how about yours?
AuPh
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The poster's logic lacks Vulcanization! ;^) - Audiophilander 01:31:05 12/01/01 (11)
- You're the one burning rubber to get away from your absurd assertions. - john dem 13:56:17 12/01/01 (10)
- To the contrary, my prophylactic response is quite logical: - Audiophilander 15:07:22 12/03/01 (0)
- the remains of the day - late 18:49:17 12/01/01 (8)
- Re: the remains of the day - Bruce from DC 06:40:19 12/03/01 (1)
- good post, minor quibble(s) - late 07:27:57 12/07/01 (0)
- Enter late, defender of the punyverse. - john dem 19:42:47 12/01/01 (5)
- intuitively obvious to the casual observer - late 21:51:33 12/01/01 (4)
- Yes, it is obvious. - john dem 23:09:50 12/01/01 (3)
- naught, plus naught, equals... - late 07:35:17 12/02/01 (2)
- Yawn...it must be late. - john dem 13:58:05 12/02/01 (1)
- Don't like losing, do you? --nt-- - late 16:16:35 12/02/01 (0)