In Reply to: How about a specialty forum for American or English language films? posted by Dalton on March 14, 2004 at 23:31:48:
All movies have a plot - some are un-intelligable. Something I learned long ago taking all those English Lit classes. Many people think that a piece of writing that is open to endless interpretations is actually a good piece of writing. Which it isn't.Many people who think they know something about film fall into this exact same trap. This is different from open endings, or characters that can be viewed in different ways.
Take 81/2. Here is a film director making a film about himself not being able to generate an idea of what film to make. He has been given the money to make a film but has no idea what to make.
Fellini's EGO is so gigantic that he thinks his "writer's Block" is actually important, relevant or interesting. It's mere self-indulgent stream of consciousness.
Trouble is of course it isn't REALLY stram of consciosness because this requires spontenaity and presumably Fellini had to cast actors, hire technicians write or have written a screenplay. So it isn't stream of consciousness.
Cinematography is average by today's standards, performances largely caricatures. None of them are relevant - the audience sure doesn't learn anything other than the guy is horny and has a creative block. A long philisophically trite speach to him toward the end is laughable philisophical psychobabble.
Thanks but if I want deep philisophical thought I'll read someone who is competant in the field. Aristotle, Thales, Socrates. Fellini wouldn't get out of a first year course.
Attack Hollywood? No thanks I will take the cotton candy for the brains Star Wars/Empire Strikes Back and laugh at the tongue in cheek sillyness and enjoy myself. Or a serious film about something of remote relevance like the War Zone.
And if I venture into philisophical film I'll watch Krysztof Kieslowski's Three Colours or Kirosawa's Shakespeare rippoffs like the Seven Samurai. At least if you're going to re-invent something it may as well be Shakespeare - Kirosawa actually makes moving heartfelt films...on that Hollywood did fail with Citizen Kane an emotionally void film with cinematography that is indeed impressive. Too bad it superceded the story and looks more like STUNT photography than actually serving the story. Oh but that's right it has a strike for having a story in the first place no?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: How about a specialty forum for American or English language films? - RGA 09:46:30 03/15/04 (19)
- Re: How about a specialty forum for American or English language films? - rico 11:39:24 03/15/04 (5)
- Re: How about a specialty forum for American or English language films? - RGA 17:02:05 03/15/04 (4)
- Talk To Her is a forgettable film - Victor Khomenko 12:10:05 03/16/04 (0)
- Re: It's "Ran" - rico 08:32:27 03/16/04 (2)
- Re: It's "Ran" - RGA 22:30:23 03/17/04 (0)
- Of course. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 12:10:45 03/16/04 (0)
- Re: I would like to be... - patrickU 10:37:57 03/15/04 (10)
- Colors was kaka. nt - clarkjohnsen 13:44:08 03/15/04 (5)
- Re: Is that you Victor? nt - patrickU 13:52:22 03/15/04 (4)
- 'Twas I myself. nt - clarkjohnsen 14:32:14 03/15/04 (0)
- No, I think that's REAL clark coming out! (nt) - Victor Khomenko 13:55:12 03/15/04 (2)
- Re: Three Kaka´s won´t make a Forum. nt - patrickU 14:00:21 03/15/04 (1)
- How about four? Let me talk to Dmitry. - Victor Khomenko 15:00:20 03/15/04 (0)
- I agree on "Colors" - Victor Khomenko 10:45:27 03/15/04 (3)
- Re: I agree on "Colors" - patrickU 10:55:53 03/15/04 (2)
- Re: I agree on "Colors" - Victor Khomenko 11:48:27 03/15/04 (1)
- Re: I agree on "Colors" - patrickU 11:55:17 03/15/04 (0)
- Re: How about a specialty forum for American or English language films? - Victor Khomenko 10:21:09 03/15/04 (1)
- Re: How about a specialty forum for American or English language films? - RGA 16:40:37 03/15/04 (0)