In Reply to: LOL! Thanks Victor; you've made Dalton's case even better than I did. posted by Audiophilander on March 15, 2004 at 13:25:33:
Just because we did not like LOTR.
AuPh we are NOT pretentious or else. We have an opinion made of ( for me ) of more than foty five years of movies watching, and you and your kind are the real pretentious, and the one that does not tolerate others opinions.
Show me in our films discussions what is pretentious, ah maybe you speaks of films you never have seen and never will see, if that is pretentious, then we are, I recognise culprit.
How about changing the boring discussion in something more positive and start a new life with a new film?
Patrick
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Yours and Patrick´s pretentious self absorbed posts... - patrickU 13:51:19 03/15/04 (24)
- "Just because we did not like LOTR." He's very sensitive about that, and Return to the Planet of the Apes. nt - clarkjohnsen 14:14:24 03/15/04 (23)
- "Return to the Planet of the Amateur Monkey-boy Writers" Sorry Clark, never saw that flick; were you in it? - Audiophilander 15:18:43 03/15/04 (22)
- Why you keep lying? - Victor Khomenko 15:28:10 03/15/04 (21)
- My wife kindly, and very modestly I might add, responded to your's and her remarks as well. - Audiophilander 15:38:43 03/15/04 (20)
- Re: Well I never said ALL was negative in theses films! Take as an exemple... - patrickU 00:08:02 03/16/04 (0)
- Then it was not just one quick kaka dismissal. Say it - truth won't hurt. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 15:44:04 03/15/04 (7)
- If you're refering to your wife's comments, I don't believe she used such vulgarity in her stated opinion. - Audiophilander 17:45:52 03/15/04 (6)
- Whine... cry... whine more... cry more - Victor Khomenko 18:11:00 03/15/04 (5)
- "...those you routinely insult don't end up whining like a pregnant 13 years old..." - Care to elaborate? - Audiophilander 01:55:58 03/16/04 (4)
- You lied, and you got caught... and you were not man enough to apologize - Victor Khomenko 04:59:33 03/16/04 (3)
- You never addressed the origins of your odd example; do I detect a pregnant pause? (nt) - Audiophilander 11:40:41 03/16/04 (0)
- "I would never throw a hysterical feat..." Don't you mean... - clarkjohnsen 08:05:42 03/16/04 (1)
- "...and him claiming to be so pleasant and all." - Oh, I'm very pleasant, ...to those deserving of it. - Audiophilander 11:36:40 03/16/04 (0)
- Next you are gonna tell us Titanic deserved some too - Victor Khomenko 15:43:02 03/15/04 (10)
- Re: Next you are gonna tell us Titanic deserved some too - Analog Scott 18:03:05 03/15/04 (9)
- I think your argument is with AuPh, not me - Victor Khomenko 18:13:43 03/15/04 (8)
- Re: I think your argument is with AuPh, not me - Analog Scott 14:27:04 03/16/04 (7)
- Re: I think your argument is with AuPh, not me - Victor Khomenko 14:52:19 03/16/04 (6)
- So, folks who disagree with your opinions are playing some "idiotic game" huh? - Audiophilander 11:54:22 03/17/04 (5)
- Never bother yourself with reading the treat before jumping in - Victor Khomenko 13:57:46 03/17/04 (4)
- "When you have chance to comprehend what we are talking about..." - I don't need to fully comprehend it... - Audiophilander 14:10:14 03/17/04 (3)
- "I don't need to fully comprehend it" LOL! And you didn't. - Victor Khomenko 14:21:52 03/17/04 (2)
- "I know you hate me..." - No, I don't; is that what this is all about in your opinion? - Audiophilander 15:02:39 03/17/04 (1)
- Anywhere you go there are dogoodders - Victor Khomenko 15:15:12 03/17/04 (0)