In Reply to: "Return to the Planet of the Amateur Monkey-boy Writers" Sorry Clark, never saw that flick; were you in it? posted by Audiophilander on March 15, 2004 at 15:18:43:
You and some others here are determined to force others to eat more kaka than absolutely necessary.Get this message - a kaka movie doesn't need to be watched in full.
It also doesn't deserve more comment than one simple kaka.
LOTR is one such movie.
So while I usually provide more justification of kaka rating in my posts (see archives, if interested), that one doesn't deserve any more than a quick dismissive kaka statement.
So you feel rejected... you put that giant excrement on the table and many ran away from it... you are left to consume it all by yourself.
Right. BUT... no one forced you to eat it. So do as you wish, but stop whining at the rejection - you are getting beyond repetitions.
And frankly... you are lying here, plain and simple.
You know full well I have written quite a few words on that piece of crap - so why are you lying? And so did my wife.
So don't be a cheap liar - stop bending truth.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Why you keep lying? - Victor Khomenko 15:28:10 03/15/04 (21)
- My wife kindly, and very modestly I might add, responded to your's and her remarks as well. - Audiophilander 15:38:43 03/15/04 (20)
- Re: Well I never said ALL was negative in theses films! Take as an exemple... - patrickU 00:08:02 03/16/04 (0)
- Then it was not just one quick kaka dismissal. Say it - truth won't hurt. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 15:44:04 03/15/04 (7)
- If you're refering to your wife's comments, I don't believe she used such vulgarity in her stated opinion. - Audiophilander 17:45:52 03/15/04 (6)
- Whine... cry... whine more... cry more - Victor Khomenko 18:11:00 03/15/04 (5)
- "...those you routinely insult don't end up whining like a pregnant 13 years old..." - Care to elaborate? - Audiophilander 01:55:58 03/16/04 (4)
- You lied, and you got caught... and you were not man enough to apologize - Victor Khomenko 04:59:33 03/16/04 (3)
- You never addressed the origins of your odd example; do I detect a pregnant pause? (nt) - Audiophilander 11:40:41 03/16/04 (0)
- "I would never throw a hysterical feat..." Don't you mean... - clarkjohnsen 08:05:42 03/16/04 (1)
- "...and him claiming to be so pleasant and all." - Oh, I'm very pleasant, ...to those deserving of it. - Audiophilander 11:36:40 03/16/04 (0)
- Next you are gonna tell us Titanic deserved some too - Victor Khomenko 15:43:02 03/15/04 (10)
- Re: Next you are gonna tell us Titanic deserved some too - Analog Scott 18:03:05 03/15/04 (9)
- I think your argument is with AuPh, not me - Victor Khomenko 18:13:43 03/15/04 (8)
- Re: I think your argument is with AuPh, not me - Analog Scott 14:27:04 03/16/04 (7)
- Re: I think your argument is with AuPh, not me - Victor Khomenko 14:52:19 03/16/04 (6)
- So, folks who disagree with your opinions are playing some "idiotic game" huh? - Audiophilander 11:54:22 03/17/04 (5)
- Never bother yourself with reading the treat before jumping in - Victor Khomenko 13:57:46 03/17/04 (4)
- "When you have chance to comprehend what we are talking about..." - I don't need to fully comprehend it... - Audiophilander 14:10:14 03/17/04 (3)
- "I don't need to fully comprehend it" LOL! And you didn't. - Victor Khomenko 14:21:52 03/17/04 (2)
- "I know you hate me..." - No, I don't; is that what this is all about in your opinion? - Audiophilander 15:02:39 03/17/04 (1)
- Anywhere you go there are dogoodders - Victor Khomenko 15:15:12 03/17/04 (0)