In Reply to: Re: Good Hollywood movies/what happened? posted by patrickU on March 16, 2004 at 13:33:40:
Well that´s a poor man development of character. And that is THE problem, people get used to be satisfy than less than nothing.First you say there was no character development then when I point out that there is a substantial amount of character develoment you now call it "poor man's character development." What was wrong with the character development in the context of the story arc in Gladiator. I thought it was complex, human and revealed in an artistic and telling manner within the unfolding of the plot lines.
" It is just flesh without real meat, only a layout."
How so? What was lacking? Real meat is just a metaphor but for what?
Look forward to discuss some Italian films from Sica to Fellini or Bergman, take your pick!That may be intersting.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Good Hollywood movies/what happened? - Analog Scott 13:45:03 03/16/04 (5)
- Re: Good Hollywood movies/what happened? - patrickU 13:55:07 03/16/04 (4)
- Re: Good Hollywood movies/what happened? - Analog Scott 14:04:32 03/16/04 (3)
- Re: Good Hollywood movies/what happened? - patrickU 04:46:40 03/17/04 (0)
- Bad style - Victor Khomenko 14:47:43 03/16/04 (1)
- Re: Bad style - Analog Scott 15:29:51 03/16/04 (0)