In Reply to: "Debate on film without the personal attacks." ROTFLMAO! posted by clarkjohnsen on March 18, 2004 at 07:27:38:
There's a difference between saying, "I don't like "X" because the script is awful, the acting is unconvincing, etc." and saying something along the lines of, "This movie is Hollywood kaka that only an uneducated fool such as yourself would enjoy." Somehow Siskel and Ebert managed to disagree on films without calling each other's taste and intelligence into question.As far as calling this place a "backwater", I stand by that. If you delete the posts made by just two like-minded individuals, what are you left with?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- What's so funny about this? - Dalton 10:28:34 03/18/04 (7)
- "What's so funny about this?" Ain't never gonna happen! Thas' whas' funny. nt - clarkjohnsen 14:01:27 03/18/04 (0)
- Now you are a liar too - Victor Khomenko 10:33:32 03/18/04 (5)
- So, you've just called me a "despicable liar" and a "Neanderthal"... - Dalton 10:37:10 03/18/04 (4)
- LOL n/t - Troy 11:14:37 03/18/04 (0)
- Yes, you are a despicable liar for doing dishonest thing - Victor Khomenko 10:40:53 03/18/04 (2)
- I am publickly removing my words - Victor Khomenko 11:12:22 03/18/04 (1)
- No retraction... no guts. (nt) - Victor Khomenko 16:48:43 03/18/04 (0)